| — |
https://twitter.com/MattCowgill/status/210546965858103296/photo/1 “ABS data show labour costs are near record lows”
|
| — |
“But if you read Shanahan’s article carefully, you’ll see the headline was plainly wrong. Barroso had not mentioned Gillard or anyone else in his comments about being lectured. In fact, a Canadian media outlet reported Barroso’s comments were directed at Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, whose tough talk has allegedly “irritated” the Europeans.” http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/06/19/europeans-verballed-while-imf-adopts-the-gillard-swan-lecture/ |
| — |
“Canada’s troops in Afghanistan have been “acting like terrorists, destroying communities, killing and maiming innocent people”, according to a resolution that will be voted on by New Democrats at the party’s convention in Quebec City this weekend. The resolution is one of 104 proposals on international affairs from local riding associations that will be presented at the convention.” http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=2d1586cd-646f-4358-93e5-567e77d87b59 |
| — | Is she joking? |
| — |
“I know what taxes are. I see them every day in too many manifestations. They are everywhere, but there is no trace of a tax on carbon in the 18 pieces of legislation which will be debated in Parliament from today. Now, I have on rare occasions come across speeding fines - penalties designed to encourage me to drive at acceptable speeds. The “clean energy” legislation has what closely resembles a speeding fine, except in this case it is intended to encourage acceptable levels of carbon emissions. It is not a tax on carbon, just as a speeding fine is not a tax on cars.” http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/this-is-not-a-bloody-carbon-tax/ “Using more recent household expenditure data, the study found the average household would pay $8.50 a week in higher prices because of the tax (lower than Treasury’s estimate) but gain $10.90 in tax cuts and benefits (more than Treasury assumed).” Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/families-to-get-more-cash-from-carbon-scheme-20111018-1lyt8.html#ixzz1mxxM0dx9 |
| — | Oxford Dictionairy defines a “lie” as: “a statement made by somebody knowing that it is not true”. How could Gillard have known that she would end up leading a minority government and would have to agree to a carbon price to form that government? |
| — | I know how Neil Mitchell feels about the Prime Minister doesn’t reflect how I feel about her; and the polls often show that she’s preferred Prime Minister over Tony Abbott who the shock jocks treat like a son. As Bob Brown said the sexism directed at the Prime Minister comes from male “commentators” ie. the shock jocks; and their minuscule anti-carbon tax rallies show how fringe and unrepresentative of the majority of Australians they are. |
| — |
“The former conservative prime minister John Howard was a great defender of “middle-class welfare”, although he hated the term. His government famously worked the budget for all it was worth, delivering family tax benefits, baby bonuses and private health insurance rebates in return for a swag of votes from working families who preferred not to think of such gratuities as “welfare”, but rather as support for well-deserving families like … well, them.” Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/tough-past-makes-a-mockery-of-the-culture-of-entitlement-20120215-1t783.html#ixzz1mXbrk1XF ” In a report to be released on Wednesday, Tax Watch says Australia ranks in the bottom third of oeCD countries in terms of tax levels. ” …
“Tax Watch says it is also striking that Australia’s government expenditure, as a share of GDP, is very low. “”The oeCD only gives data for 28 of the 30 countries, but of those 28 we’re the third lowest in terms of government expenditure,” Professor Disney said. “So we’re not a big government-spending country.”“ http://www.abc.net.au/news/2010-04-13/top-economists-want-tax-loopholes-closed/394514 “Before the program, the industry experienced around 1 fire per every 765 odd installations – or 1.3 fires per every 1000 installs. Under the insulation program, even though the number of total fires increased by 2.3 times, the number of installations increased by 18.7 times compared to what happened before the program. As a result, under the program the industry experienced 1 fire per every 6158 odd installs – or 0.16 fires per 1000 installs. That makes the insulation program around 8 times safer in terms of fire incidents compared to the state of the industry before the program.” http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2010/10/19/insulation-fire-risk-%E2%80%93-the-data-is-in/
|




